The Left Vs. Right Debates Are Unproductive and A Distraction From Defending Individual Liberties
The discussions we should be debating is Libertarianism Vs. Authoritarianism here's why:
The Left Vs. Right Debates Are Unproductive and A Distraction From Defending Individual Liberties
The Left vs. Right rhetoric only divides us. It distracts us from the critical task of defending our autonomy and civil rights. The dialogue is consistently wrapped around who will lie, cheat, steal, and rule the least. But it doesn't have to be that way.
America came from the promise of life, liberty, property, and the pursuit of happiness delivered in the Declaration of Independence; fast forward to today, it's 'obey tyrannical authority or lose it all.'
Both authoritarian political parties have ignored the U.S. Constitution and have abused the Commerce Clause to control individuals' personal lives.
The Commerce Clause refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution, which gives Congress the power "to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes."
The United States Constitution is the supreme law of the United States of America. It was written in 1787 and has been in effect since 1789. The purpose of the U.S. Constitution is to establish the framework of government for the United States, including the relationship between the federal government and the states, and to protect American citizens' inalienable rights and freedoms.
Some of the critical purposes of the U.S. Constitution include the following:
Establishing a system of government with three branches (legislative, executive, and judicial) that are separate but equal in power and responsible for different aspects of governing the country.
It defines the powers of the federal government. It limits its authority to protect the rights of individuals and the states.
It establishes a system of checks and balances to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful.
It is supposed to guarantee individual rights and liberties, such as freedom of speech, religion, and the press, and protect citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures.
It provides a framework for amending the Constitution to reflect changing times and needs.
Overall, the U.S. Constitution serves as the foundation of American liberty and justice, outlining the principles and values upon which the country was founded and providing the framework for its government and legal system.
The legislative branch creates unconstitutional laws for the executive branch to enforce. The judicial branch typically interprets the law favoring the Democrat and Republican ran governments over protecting the people's rights and liberties.
To make things worse, the two authoritarian political parties focus on problems they have created to manipulate the population, attacking each other over issues that don't affect most people. The people supporting these two parties typically weaponize the government to control and steal from others for their selfish desires.
Typical Examples:
Can't afford healthcare on your own? Support the politicians and political parties that steal money from others on your behalf!
Don't you like people getting paid for sex? Hire a politician and political party that will kidnap, extort, and throw people in a cage for doing it.
Neither party is actively correcting unconstitutional legislation through repeals that benefit the people. Both parties take away your rights and freedoms; they campaign to give them back with regulations and at a heavy price. The government doesn't want anything to exist without controlling and benefiting from it.
Remember, the government comprises a small group of men calling themselves the government. They are humans, just like the rest of us. Their authority is limited, and it requires the consent of the governed.
Both sides are about control. There is nothing minimal about how these two parties govern. How many of you have consented to pay for someone else's healthcare, getting thrown in a cage for what you chose to consume, or your rights being bargained between politicians and other people?
I haven’t consented to that, and I’m sure many of you haven’t either. So, why are voters keeping these two parties in power?
Many won't like to hear this, but the non-voting population has done less to destroy liberty in this country than those politically active. They aren't voting to remove your rights or grow the government, but they can be activated to secure our rights and shrink the government by looking up and down. Not left or right.
It's important to note that according to data from the United States Census Bureau, voter turnout for the 2020 presidential election was approximately 66.4% of the citizen voting-age population. This means about 33.6% of the citizen voting-age population did not vote in the 2020 election.
There are many reasons why some people may not participate in elections. Here are some of the most common:
Lack of interest or engagement: Some people may not be interested in politics or may not feel that their vote would make a difference.
Disenfranchisement: Certain groups, such as people with felony convictions or non-citizens, may be ineligible to vote.
Inconvenience: People may need more time or resources to take time off work, travel to a polling location, or wait in line to vote.
Mistrust in the system: Some people may believe the election system needs to be fairer or distrust the government.
Many don't like either the Democrat or Republican Party.
The belief that their vote doesn't matter: Some people may feel that their voice won't make a difference in the outcome of an election.
Election fatigue: People may feel overwhelmed by the constant barrage of political ads and news coverage, leading them to tune out of the election process.
These are just some reasons why some people may not participate in elections.
Regarding the 'Independents,' they typically swing back and forth between the two authoritarian political parties. Imagine if that changed to Libertarianism vs. Authoritarianism instead, and the Libertarian Party captured the non-voters votes.
The two-party system dominated by authoritarian parties would be replaced with a design that represents libertarianism and one that represents authoritarianism. This would have a significant impact on independent voting patterns as well as Democrat and Republican voting patterns.
For example, some Independent voters who previously swung between the two major parties may now be drawn to the Libertarian Party due to its emphasis on individual liberty, limited government intervention, and a free market economy. On the other hand, some Democrats and Republicans who previously aligned more with one of the authoritarian platforms may now shift their support to the respective party that champions such policies. As of January 2023, GALLUP reports the U.S. Party Affiliation Stats: Independents 40%, Democrats 30%, and Republicans 27%.
Overall, this shift in the political landscape could lead to a more diverse and nuanced political discourse and provide voters with more choices that better align with their values and beliefs. It could also spark new debates and discussions around government power, personal freedom, and economic policies. The U.S. government would be forced to respect the checks and balances that are supposed to keep the government's size small and authority limited.
Which political philosophy most closely represents the time of government we have in effect today, and which more closely identifies with your values and the U.S. Constitution?
What is Authoritarianism?
Authoritarianism is a form of government characterized by a strong central power with limited political freedoms for citizens, a lack of political pluralism, and a focus on maintaining order and control. Under an authoritarian system, the government has high control over all aspects of society, including the economy, media, education, and even individual behavior. Often, a single leader or ruling party has complete control over the government and enforces its policies through coercion, censorship, and propaganda.
Authoritarian regimes often use fear, intimidation, and violence to maintain their grip on power. They may suppress opposition or dissenting views through imprisonment, torture, or execution. Some examples of authoritarian regimes include North Korea, China, Russia, and many countries in the Middle East and Africa. While authoritarianism can take many forms, it is generally characterized by a lack of representation, limited civil liberties, and a concentration of power in the hands of a select corrupt few.
What is Libertarianism?
Libertarianism is a political philosophy that emphasizes individual freedom, personal autonomy, and limited government intervention in people's lives. Libertarians generally believe in a free market economy, where individuals have the right to own property, make their own economic decisions, and engage in voluntary exchange without interference from the government.
Libertarians also advocate for personal freedom and civil liberties, such as freedom of speech, religion, and association. They often oppose government regulations and restrictions on individual behavior, including drug laws, prostitution laws, and other "morality" laws that they see as infringing on individual liberty.
While libertarians generally believe in a limited government focused on protecting individual rights and freedoms, they do not necessarily oppose all government action. For example, they may support a government that provides for a robust national defense, enforces contracts, and protects property rights. However, they are typically opposed to government intervention in the economy, personal behavior, and social issues.
It has roots in classical liberalism and has been championed by various thinkers and politicians, including John Locke, Friedrich Hayek, and Ron Paul.
Suppose the political landscape shifted from a two-party system dominated by authoritarian parties to a two-party system where one party represents libertarianism and the other represents authoritarianism. In that case, it could significantly impact the voting patterns of Independents and Democrats, and Republicans.
Overall, this shift in the political landscape could lead to a more diverse and nuanced political discourse and provide voters with more choices that better align with their values and beliefs. It could also spark new debates and discussions around government power, personal freedom, and economic policies. However, the success of the Libertarian party would depend on how well it can position itself as a viable alternative to the dominant parties and gain widespread support.
“A man's natural rights are his own, against the whole world; and any infringement of them is equally a crime; whether committed by one man, or by millions; whether committed by one man, calling himself a robber, or by millions calling themselves a government.”
-Lysander Spooner